Last Updated: January 3, 2026
Whether you're evolving the purpose of a branch, correcting a naming mistake, or simply trying to maintain clarity in your branching strategy, knowing how to rename branches is essential.
This chapter will demystify the process by covering the various methods for renaming branches, understanding the implications of those changes, and practical considerations for doing so.
Branch names serve as identifiers for different lines of development in your project. A good branch name should be descriptive, concise, and indicative of the work being done.
When you find that a branch name no longer reflects its purpose, or if you simply misspelled it, renaming the branch is the way to go.
Renaming a branch can be crucial for several reasons:
These reasons underscore the importance of maintaining an organized branch structure. A well-maintained branch naming convention keeps the repository easy to navigate and understand.
Renaming a branch locally is straightforward. You can do this using the git branch command with the -m option.
If you are currently on the branch that you wish to rename, the command is simple:
If you need to rename a branch that you are not currently on, specify the old branch name and the new name:
Consider you have a branch named feature/old-name, but you've decided that feature/new-name is more appropriate. Here’s how you would rename it:
When you rename a branch, Git updates its internal references. Specifically, the branch pointer in the .git/refs/heads/ directory is changed to point to the same commit but under a different name. The commit history remains intact; you are merely changing the label.
Renaming branches on the remote can be trickier, as it involves more than just changing a name locally. Here’s the process for renaming a remote branch.
First, rename the local branch as described above.
Now, push the renamed branch to the remote repository:
To complete the renaming process, you need to delete the old branch from the remote:
Suppose you renamed your local branch from feature/old-name to feature/new-name. You would execute:
Changing branch names can lead to confusion if not managed properly, especially in collaborative environments. Here are some strategies to avoid issues:
Ensure that all team members are aware of the changes. Use your team's communication channels—like Slack or email—to announce the new branch name.
After renaming a branch on the remote, team members need to update their local references. They can do this by fetching the latest references:
This command removes any remote-tracking references that no longer exist, including the old branch name.
If the renamed branch has unmerged changes, be extra cautious. Team members might still refer to the old branch name in their workflows, potentially leading to mistakes.
Here are some best practices to consider when naming branches:
feature/user-authentication or bugfix/login-error.feature/new-user-onboarding is clearer than featurenewuseronboarding.By following these practices, you can ensure that your branch names enhance clarity and contribute to a more organized and efficient workflow.
Many developers use graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to interact with Git. While the command line offers direct control, GUIs can simplify branch management, including renaming.
In these tools, renaming branches usually involves right-clicking on the branch name and selecting the "Rename" option. This action will typically handle both local and remote changes, but always verify that the remote branch is updated accordingly.
Using a GUI can help you manage branch names without memorizing commands, but understanding the underlying Git commands is still beneficial.
Now that you understand how to rename branches in both local and remote repositories, you're ready to explore the process of listing branches. In the next chapter, we will look at how to efficiently manage and view all branches in your repository, ensuring that you can navigate your project's history with ease.