Last Updated: January 18, 2026
Linked List In-Place Reversal is a technique that reverses the direction of pointers in a linked list to change the order of nodes. Instead of creating a new reversed list or using extra storage, we modify the existing next pointers so that each node points to its predecessor rather than its successor.
The core operation involves three pointers working together:
The beauty of this approach is that we are not moving data around or allocating new nodes. We are simply rewiring the connections between existing nodes. Each node stays in its memory location; only the pointers change.
The in-place reversal technique works because linked list nodes are independent objects connected only by pointers. Unlike arrays where elements must be contiguous in memory, linked list nodes can exist anywhere in memory and rely solely on their next pointer to define the sequence.
When we reverse a linked list in-place:
The key insight is that each node's next pointer is independent. When we change node A's next to point to something else, it does not affect what node B's next points to. This independence allows us to systematically redirect all pointers in a single pass through the list.
The in-place reversal pattern is your go-to technique when you encounter these situations:
1. Reversing a linked list (full or partial)
Whenever a problem asks you to reverse all or part of a linked list, this is the primary technique. Whether it is the entire list or just a section between two positions, the same pointer manipulation applies.
2. Checking for palindromes
To check if a linked list is a palindrome, you can reverse the second half and compare it with the first half. This combines the fast-slow pointer technique (to find the middle) with in-place reversal.
3. Reordering nodes
Problems that ask you to reorder nodes in a specific pattern often require reversing parts of the list. For example, alternating nodes from the start and end of a list.
4. K-group operations
When you need to process nodes in groups (like reversing every k nodes), in-place reversal applied to each group is the core operation.
Here are the telltale signs that a problem might need in-place reversal:
| Indicator | Examples |
|---|---|
| "Reverse" in problem statement | Reverse Linked List, Reverse Between |
| Checking palindrome | Palindrome Linked List |
| Reorder or interleave | Reorder List, Odd Even Linked List |
| K-group processing | Reverse Nodes in k-Group, Swap Nodes in Pairs |
| Comparing first and second half | Palindrome checks, fold matching |
The in-place reversal technique manifests in several forms, each building on the basic idea but adding complexity:
The simplest case. Reverse the entire linked list from head to tail. The original head becomes the tail, and the original tail becomes the new head.
Reverse only a portion of the list, from position m to position n. Nodes before m and after n remain in their original order. This requires careful handling of the connection points.
Reverse nodes in groups of k. If the remaining nodes are fewer than k, they may be left as-is or reversed depending on the problem variant.
Reverse alternate groups. For example, reverse the first k nodes, keep the next k as-is, reverse the next k, and so on.
Each variant requires understanding the basic reversal mechanism and then adapting it to handle boundaries and connections appropriately.
Most in-place reversal problems use one of two fundamental approaches. Let us establish them clearly.
This is the workhorse of linked list reversal. Three pointers work in coordination to reverse the list in a single pass.
The four operations inside the loop (in order):
The order of these operations is critical. Changing the order will break the algorithm.
The recursive approach is elegant but uses O(n) stack space. It works by recursing to the end of the list, then rewiring pointers on the way back.
How the recursion works:
The recursive approach is less intuitive but demonstrates a beautiful property of recursion: solving the smaller problem first, then handling the connection.
| Approach | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iterative | O(1) space, straightforward | More code | Production code, interviews |
| Recursive | Elegant, less code | O(n) stack space | Understanding concepts, small lists |
In interviews, the iterative approach is generally preferred because it uses constant space. However, being able to explain both shows deeper understanding.