You are given an integer array cookies, where cookies[i] denotes the number of cookies in the ith bag. You are also given an integer k that denotes the number of children to distribute all the bags of cookies to. All the cookies in the same bag must go to the same child and cannot be split up.
The unfairness of a distribution is defined as the maximum total cookies obtained by a single child in the distribution.
Return the minimum unfairness of all distributions.
Input: cookies = [8,15,10,20,8], k = 2
Output: 31
Explanation: One optimal distribution is [8,15,8] and [10,20]
- The 1st child receives [8,15,8] which has a total of 8 + 15 + 8 = 31 cookies.
- The 2nd child receives [10,20] which has a total of 10 + 20 = 30 cookies.
The unfairness of the distribution is max(31,30) = 31. It can be shown that there is no distribution with an unfairness less than 31.
Example 2:
Input: cookies = [6,1,3,2,2,4,1,2], k = 3
Output: 7
Explanation: One optimal distribution is [6,1], [3,2,2], and [4,1,2]
- The 1st child receives [6,1] which has a total of 6 + 1 = 7 cookies.
- The 2nd child receives [3,2,2] which has a total of 3 + 2 + 2 = 7 cookies.
- The 3rd child receives [4,1,2] which has a total of 4 + 1 + 2 = 7 cookies.
The unfairness of the distribution is max(7,7,7) = 7. It can be shown that there is no distribution with an unfairness less than 7.
The problem involves assigning cookies to children in such a way that the most "unfortunate" child (one with the most cookies) is as fortunate as possible. Given the constraints, a brute force backtracking approach can be applied to attempt all possible distributions of cookies to the children.
We can enhance the previous backtracking approach by pruning paths early when they don't promise a better result. This can be done by ensuring that no intermediate state has an unfairness greater than the currently found best solution.